[原创] Enlargement Comparison
<P>There are many sharpening software out there, but which one perform the best? One basic rule, you really can\'t get what is already out there~~</P><P>1) Photoshop bicubic x2</P>
<P>[upload=gif]UploadFile/2005-5/200551015441671.gif[/upload]</P>H]8u$X#O9b
<P>The result is pretty good, the picture is slightly burred at the edge, otherwise the image is pretty sharp. No specific JPEG artifact appears; the contract is also maintained.</P>
<P>(结果相当好, 图片边缘轻微地burred。具体JPEG 人工artifact 没出现)</P>
<P>2) Photoshop bicubic sharpener x2
</P>Oy~ y amRO v'|
<P>[upload=gif]UploadFile/2005-5/2005510154545104.gif[/upload]</P>
<P>Exactly the same as above, the only difference might be the color depth; no significant changes has been made compare to the above image.</P>
<P>(大致同样)
</P>----------------------------------------- s+r?%m(@C
<FONT color=#ff0000>奖励用户：奖励， 用户操作：金钱5，经验3，魅力3 操作者：tigerfish8M+J*\n8@ l$D
</FONT> dB/{&d4_(x"K
jC o a'i
<P>3) Genetic Fractial v4</P>rs zh-?6ocz.]
<P>[upload=gif]UploadFile/2005-5/2005510154843705.gif[/upload]</P>,D.j@ {7y"SdJ
<P>The image is indeed sharper and more <FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3>sophisticated</FONT>!! But take a look at the green areas, there are many noise exist in the area. Basically you can simply achieved this level by using USM in the photoshop. </P>$\ wS:km(o
<P>(图象的确是更加锋利!! 但看一看绿色区域, 那里有许多噪訊存在。您基本上能简单地达到了这个水平由USM 在photoshop 。)</P>
<P>4) S-Spline (photozoom) pro photoshop v1.9</P>PT^N _
<P>[upload=gif]UploadFile/2005-5/2005510155612.gif[/upload]</P>
<P>The image is sharper, and it also give you a cropped image~~!! This is not good because you will lose 1% of your original data. Many people in swcool said this program is amazing, but I personally don\'t think there is any advantage over other method above.</P>K&S A4A A%@S+i
<P>(图象更加锋利, but its 99% cropped~~!! 这不是好的因为您将丢失1% 您原始的数据。许多人在swcool 说这个filter 是令人惊讶的, 但我不认为有任一好处在其它方法上面。)</P>
<P>5) Lancoz (photozoom) photoshop plugin</P> Q Y8Lbwt]
<P>[upload=gif]UploadFile/2005-5/2005510155717144.gif[/upload]</P>8}b,H ~a@LF.`
<P>Greater color rendition, slightly sharper than bicubic, otherwise the method is pretty much the same~~</P> \~i5G s M*[/|!d5w
<P>6) conclusion:</P>E0Bx5F5s'T3b
<P>There are many enlargement programs out there, but certainly there are no "magic" tools. The math used on those programs are basically the same. <B><EM>"You can\'t really create what is not out there"</EM></B> quoted from a member right here.</P> Z;m@~yH GC8_A
<P>(您基本上不需要任何扩大工具除photoshop 之外) (CS or CS2 only)</P>
<P>Using photoshop bicubic is all you need~~:p</P>
<P>Can someone help me to translate to chinese??</P>
6GpC4f3jU S9d`
怎么写英文，看不懂 <P>TTdown has both genetic fractal v4 and photozoom pro~~ :p [em07]</P>p.O5n.UlU~%`
<P>Sorry my computer system is English</P>
(lI&w"Sa'Qq,R_7n
<P>理解不能发中文帖子，但是....可以稍微检查一下语法。</P><P>另外，XP的语言功能应该很强了，不知道楼主用的什么版本</P> <P>语法 alittle bad, but some are just english slang~~ sorry :p</P><P>I added some chinese description~</P>[em05] <P>#^.?0GKB!E-KaT6xp
<FONT face=System>正面的论述和分析已经做过很多不再重复了。假如放大能有“滤镜奇迹”，Adobe 为什么不把那个技术买下来，难道 Adobe 买不起？除非对方是它的死敌，可死敌为什么要给 PhotoShop 做滤镜？</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=System>凡人大多希望有奇迹，越无知的人越愿意相信号称的奇迹。基本上，相信“无损放大”奇迹的和相信 FL 功的是同一类人。</FONT>&uPG;O:[#T_
</P> <P>Besides, what adobe buy (<FONT face=System>买) is what really useful:</FONT></P><P><FONT face=System>Photoshop CS2 Add: (1) Noise reduction (噪訊), (2) Lens Correction (變形): prove that these tools are useful for "photographer"</FONT></P><P><FONT face=System>Maybe later we will see noise image vs. adobe noise reduction, or panoTool vs. adobe panotool ( I think adobe steel panotool because panotool is free)</FONT></P><P><FONT face=System>I\'m going to 旅行 so I won\'t go online often this summer </FONT></P>[em07] 顶起来啊！！！
页:
[1]